BOIL vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOIL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $372M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -55.21% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -67.63% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -69.59% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -70.29% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 93.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
BOIL vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BOIL returned -67.63% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, BOIL is down 55.21% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, BOIL compounded at -69.59% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -70.29% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -58.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 93.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for BOIL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOIL charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOIL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BOIL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOIL or VTI?
BOIL has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOIL or VTI?
Over the past year BOIL returned -67.63% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BOIL annualized -58.06% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOIL or VTI?
BOIL has been the more volatile fund at 93.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BOIL -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BOIL and VTI?
BOIL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOIL and VTI?
BOIL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOIL or VTI?
BOIL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.