BOIL vs VOO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOIL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $348M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -52.01% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -65.01% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -69.42% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -69.74% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 93.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BOIL vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BOIL returned -65.01% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, BOIL is down 52.01% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, BOIL compounded at -69.42% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -69.74% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs -57.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 93.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for BOIL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOIL charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOIL currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BOIL and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOIL or VOO?
BOIL has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOIL or VOO?
Over the past year BOIL returned -65.01% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BOIL annualized -57.88% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOIL or VOO?
BOIL has been the more volatile fund at 93.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BOIL -100.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BOIL and VOO?
BOIL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOIL and VOO?
BOIL and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOIL or VOO?
BOIL yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.