BOUT vs SPY
CapForce IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. BOUT delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOUT | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $16M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +25.96% | +13.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.46% | +22.52% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.71% | +21.36% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.42% | +13.19% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2018 | Jan 22, 1993 |
BOUT vs SPY Performance
CapForce IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) is a ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year BOUT returned +24.46% while SPY returned +22.52%. Year to date, BOUT is up 25.96% versus a gain of 13.39% for SPY.
Over three years, BOUT compounded at +13.71% per year against +21.36% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +6.42% and +13.19% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.84% annualized vs +8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for BOUT and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOUT charges 0.80% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $9 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOUT currently yields 0.26% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
BOUT and SPY share 22 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOUT or SPY?
BOUT has an expense ratio of 0.80% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOUT or SPY?
Over the past year BOUT returned +24.46% vs +22.52% for SPY, so BOUT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BOUT annualized +8.56% vs +8.84% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOUT or SPY?
BOUT has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: BOUT -36.8% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both BOUT and SPY?
BOUT and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOUT and SPY?
BOUT and SPY share 22 common holdings with a 12.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOUT or SPY?
BOUT yields 0.26% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.