BOUT vs VTI
CapForce IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOUT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.03% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.73% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.71% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.28% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Capital-FORCE ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
BOUT vs VTI Performance
CapForce IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) is a ETF from Capital-FORCE ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BOUT returned +21.73% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, BOUT is up 26.03% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, BOUT compounded at +13.71% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.28% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, BOUT has the edge at +8.56% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BOUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for BOUT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOUT charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOUT currently yields 0.26% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BOUT and VTI share 34 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOUT or VTI?
BOUT has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BOUT or VTI?
Over the past year BOUT returned +21.73% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BOUT annualized +8.56% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BOUT or VTI?
BOUT has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BOUT -36.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BOUT and VTI?
BOUT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BOUT and VTI?
BOUT and VTI share 34 common holdings with a 11.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOUT or VTI?
BOUT yields 0.26% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.