BPH vs IVV
BP P.L.C. ADRhedged vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BPH or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BPH led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BPH | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.70% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +30.90%Best | +12.27% |
| 1Y Return | +39.77%Best | +17.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.1% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $14,368Best | $13,208 |
| Fund Family | ADRH | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 7, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.7 years).
BPH vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
BPH vs IVV Performance
BP P.L.C. ADRhedged (BPH) is an ETF from ADRH and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BPH returned +39.77% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, BPH is up 30.90% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BPH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.1% compared with 12.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for BPH and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BPH charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BPH currently yields 2.70% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in BPH and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.9% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in BPH and 490 in IVV, against full books of 2 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BPH and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BPH or IVV?
BPH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BPH or IVV?
Over the past year BPH returned +39.77% vs +17.04% for IVV, so BPH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BPH annualized +23.76% vs +17.78% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BPH or IVV?
BPH has been the more volatile fund at 34.1% annualized versus 12.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BPH -26.3% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BPH and IVV?
BPH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BPH or IVV?
BPH yields 2.70% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BPH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BPH?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BPH led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.