BPI vs SCHD
Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BPI | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $2M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 30.80% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -9.52% | +27.67% | |
| 1Y Return | -26.84% | +29.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.2% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 2, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BPI vs SCHD Performance
Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF (BPI) is a ETF from Grayscale and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BPI returned -26.84% while SCHD returned +29.56%. Year to date, BPI is down 9.52% versus a gain of 27.67% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BPI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.2% for BPI and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BPI charges 0.65% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $6 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BPI currently yields 30.80% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BPI and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BPI or SCHD?
BPI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BPI or SCHD?
Over the past year BPI returned -26.84% vs +29.56% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BPI annualized -6.42% vs +11.55% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BPI or SCHD?
BPI has been the more volatile fund at 40.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: BPI -49.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BPI and SCHD?
BPI and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BPI and SCHD?
BPI and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BPI or SCHD?
BPI yields 30.80% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so BPI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.