BRSM vs IVV

BRSM vs IVV

Which is better, BRSM or IVV?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BRSM is less concentrated, with 10.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: BRSM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBRSMIVV
Expense Ratio0.38%0.03%Best
AUM$27M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings311508
YTD Return+0.59%+11.03%Best
1Y Return-+15.62%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.81%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.61%
Top 10 Weight10.2%Best37.8%
Fund FamilyMFS Investment ManagementiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 4, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BRSM vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BRSM vs IVV Performance

MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF (BRSM) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BRSM is up 0.59% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BRSM charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRSM currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

BRSM already in IVV11.9%
IVV already in BRSM0.8%

11.9% of BRSM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.8% of IVV's money is in holdings BRSM also owns.

BRSM and IVV share little of their money.

26 positions in common, counted across the 311 positions we hold weights for in BRSM and 490 in IVV, against full books of 311 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 456 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BRSM (97.9% of the fund), and 272 for BRSM that do not appear in IVV (84.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BRSMWeight in IVVDifference
EGEverest Group Ltd Common Stock0.99%0.02%0.97%
UHSUniversal Health Services Inc.0.97%0.01%0.96%
GDDYGodaddy Inc. Class A0.77%0.02%0.75%
NDSNNordson Corp0.75%0.03%0.72%
ZBRAZebra Technologies Corp0.69%0.03%0.66%
HSTHost Hotels & Resorts Inc0.68%0.02%0.66%
JJacobs Engineering Group Inc.0.67%0.03%0.64%
SJMJ M Smucker Co/The0.66%0.02%0.64%
CRLCharles River Laboratories International Inc0.66%0.02%0.64%
TXTTextron Inc.0.58%0.02%0.56%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BRSM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BRSMIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BRSM or IVV?

BRSM has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BRSM and IVV?

11.9% of BRSM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.8% of IVV's is in holdings BRSM also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 311 positions we hold weights for in BRSM and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BRSM or IVV?

BRSM yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BRSM?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. BRSM is less concentrated, with 10.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.