BSCU vs IVV
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.63% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 447 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.52% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.71% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.40% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.41% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
BSCU vs IVV Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSCU returned +2.71% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, BSCU is up 0.52% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, BSCU compounded at +6.40% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.41% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.3% for BSCU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for BSCU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCU charges 0.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCU currently yields 4.63% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BSCU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 905 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCU or IVV?
BSCU has an expense ratio of 0.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSCU or IVV?
Over the past year BSCU returned +2.71% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BSCU annualized +0.33% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSCU or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.3% for BSCU. Worst drawdown: BSCU -22.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BSCU and IVV?
BSCU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCU and IVV?
BSCU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 905 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCU or IVV?
BSCU yields 4.63% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BSCU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.