BSCU vs VOO
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.61% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 448 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.67% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.73% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.08% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.44% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BSCU vs VOO Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSCU returned +2.73% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, BSCU is up 0.67% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, BSCU compounded at +6.08% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.44% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +0.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 7.4% for BSCU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for BSCU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCU charges 0.10% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCU currently yields 4.61% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BSCU and VOO share 0 holdings out of 905 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCU or VOO?
BSCU has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSCU or VOO?
Over the past year BSCU returned +2.73% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BSCU annualized +0.36% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSCU or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 7.4% for BSCU. Worst drawdown: BSCU -22.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BSCU and VOO?
BSCU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCU and VOO?
BSCU and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 905 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCU or VOO?
BSCU yields 4.61% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BSCU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.