BSJW vs VTI
Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $48M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 174 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.86% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.50% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
BSJW vs VTI Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSJW returned +5.50% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, BSJW is up 1.86% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 3.9% for BSJW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.5% for BSJW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJW charges 0.42% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJW currently yields 6.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BSJW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2935 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSJW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CENX | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJW or VTI?
BSJW has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSJW or VTI?
Over the past year BSJW returned +5.50% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BSJW annualized +7.25% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSJW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 3.9% for BSJW. Worst drawdown: BSJW -4.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BSJW and VTI?
BSJW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJW and VTI?
BSJW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2935 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJW or VTI?
BSJW yields 6.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BSJW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.