BSMR vs VXUS
BSMR vs VXUS
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSMR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $344M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 2,405 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.67% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.11% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.21% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.47% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BSMR vs VXUS Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSMR returned +3.11% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BSMR is up 1.67% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BSMR compounded at +3.21% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.47% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.1% for BSMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.6% for BSMR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSMR charges 0.18% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $5 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSMR currently yields 2.72% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BSMR and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8544 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSMR or VXUS?
BSMR has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $13 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSMR or VXUS?
Over the past year BSMR returned +3.11% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BSMR annualized +0.99% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSMR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.1% for BSMR. Worst drawdown: BSMR -13.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BSMR and VXUS?
BSMR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSMR and VXUS?
BSMR and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSMR or VXUS?
BSMR yields 2.72% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BSMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.