BSV vs XLK
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF vs State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, BSV or XLK?
Short Term Bond against Large Cap Growth.
BSV has a lower expense ratio. XLK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSV | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $45.6B | $121.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.01% | 0.45% |
| Holdings | 3,205 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +0.66% | +30.10%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.95% | +43.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.48% | +29.30%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.63% | +19.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4%Best | 19.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.0%Best | -53.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,842 | $24,430Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2007 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 10, 2007 to Sep 4, 2026 (19.4 years).
BSV vs XLK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BSV vs XLK Performance
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year BSV returned +1.95% while XLK returned +43.36%. Year to date, BSV is up 0.66% versus a gain of 30.10% for XLK.
Over three years, BSV compounded at +4.48% per year against +29.30% for XLK; over five years the annualized figures are +1.63% and +19.56% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, XLK has the edge at +15.50% annualized vs +0.92%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 2.4% for BSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for BSV and -53.6% for XLK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSV charges 0.03% per year while XLK charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $8 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSV currently yields 4.01% against 0.45% for XLK.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 558 holdings in BSV and 74 in XLK, totalling 16.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 558 positions we hold weights for in BSV and 74 in XLK, against full books of 3,205 and 77.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSV and XLK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSV or XLK?
BSV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLK charges 0.08%. BSV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSV or XLK?
Over the past year BSV returned +1.95% vs +43.36% for XLK, so XLK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BSV annualized +0.92% vs +15.50% for XLK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSV or XLK?
XLK has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 2.4% for BSV. Worst drawdown: BSV -9.0% vs XLK -53.6%.
Should I hold both BSV and XLK?
BSV and XLK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSV or XLK?
BSV yields 4.01% while XLK yields 0.45%, so BSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLK better than BSV?
BSV has a lower expense ratio. XLK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.