BTCC vs VTI
Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTCC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 96.32% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -22.42% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -39.95% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 2, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
BTCC vs VTI Performance
Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) is a ETF from Grayscale and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTCC returned -39.95% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, BTCC is down 22.42% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.4% for BTCC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTCC charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTCC currently yields 96.32% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BTCC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTCC or VTI?
BTCC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTCC or VTI?
Over the past year BTCC returned -39.95% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BTCC annualized -20.19% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTCC or VTI?
BTCC has been the more volatile fund at 29.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BTCC -44.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BTCC and VTI?
BTCC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTCC and VTI?
BTCC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTCC or VTI?
BTCC yields 96.32% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BTCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.