BTCI vs QQQ

BTCI vs QQQ

Which is better, BTCI or QQQ?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBTCIQQQ
Expense Ratio0.99%0.18%Best
AUM$1.3B$483.5B
Dividend Yield33.06%0.44%
Holdings9107
YTD Return-27.17%+15.94%Best
1Y Return-42.58%+20.44%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.26%
Volatility (annualized)42.1%18.9%Best
Max Drawdown-55.9%-22.8%Best
$10,000 over 1.9 years$9,217$14,543Best
Fund FamilyNEOSInvesco (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 16, 2024Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2024 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.9 years).

BTCI vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

BTCI vs QQQ Performance

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) is an ETF from NEOS and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BTCI returned -42.58% while QQQ returned +20.44%. Year to date, BTCI is down 27.17% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BTCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.1% compared with 18.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.9% for BTCI and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BTCI charges 0.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $18 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTCI currently yields 33.06% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 2 holdings in BTCI and 102 in QQQ, totalling 19.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in BTCI and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 9 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BTCI and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BTCIQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BTCI or QQQ?

BTCI has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BTCI or QQQ?

Over the past year BTCI returned -42.58% vs +20.44% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTCI annualized -4.20% vs +21.79% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BTCI or QQQ?

BTCI has been the more volatile fund at 42.1% annualized versus 18.9% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BTCI -55.9% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both BTCI and QQQ?

BTCI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BTCI or QQQ?

BTCI yields 33.06% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BTCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than BTCI?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.