BTGD vs VTI
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTGD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $44M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.62% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -25.57% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -28.32% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Quantify Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
BTGD vs VTI Performance
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) is a ETF from Quantify Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTGD returned -28.32% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, BTGD is down 25.57% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for BTGD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTGD charges 1.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $3 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTGD currently yields 5.62% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BTGD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTGD or VTI?
BTGD has an expense ratio of 1.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $106 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTGD or VTI?
Over the past year BTGD returned -28.32% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTGD annualized +17.07% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTGD or VTI?
BTGD has been the more volatile fund at 53.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BTGD -58.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BTGD and VTI?
BTGD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTGD and VTI?
BTGD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTGD or VTI?
BTGD yields 5.62% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BTGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.