BTRN vs QQQ
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTRN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $741,106.95 | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 31.46% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -10.21% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.12% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BTRN vs QQQ Performance
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BTRN returned -22.12% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, BTRN is down 10.21% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.3% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for BTRN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTRN charges 0.95% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $18 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTRN currently yields 31.46% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BTRN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTRN or QQQ?
BTRN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTRN or QQQ?
Over the past year BTRN returned -22.12% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTRN annualized -0.37% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTRN or QQQ?
BTRN has been the more volatile fund at 33.3% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BTRN -37.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BTRN and QQQ?
BTRN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTRN and QQQ?
BTRN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTRN or QQQ?
BTRN yields 31.46% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BTRN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.