BTRN vs VXUS
BTRN vs VXUS
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTRN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 31.41% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -9.97% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -23.28% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BTRN vs VXUS Performance
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BTRN returned -23.28% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BTRN is down 9.97% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for BTRN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTRN charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTRN currently yields 31.41% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BTRN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTRN or VXUS?
BTRN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BTRN or VXUS?
Over the past year BTRN returned -23.28% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTRN annualized -0.26% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BTRN or VXUS?
BTRN has been the more volatile fund at 33.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BTRN -37.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BTRN and VXUS?
BTRN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BTRN and VXUS?
BTRN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTRN or VXUS?
BTRN yields 31.41% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BTRN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.