BUFG vs IVV
FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $324M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.45% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.99% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.59% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
BUFG vs IVV Performance
FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BUFG returned +14.99% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, BUFG is up 8.45% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, BUFG compounded at +13.59% per year against +21.49% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, BUFG has the edge at +8.84% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.6% for BUFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for BUFG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFG charges 1.13% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $3 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFG currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BUFG and IVV share 0 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFG or IVV?
BUFG has an expense ratio of 1.13% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $110 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUFG or IVV?
Over the past year BUFG returned +14.99% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BUFG annualized +8.84% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUFG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.6% for BUFG. Worst drawdown: BUFG -17.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BUFG and IVV?
BUFG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BUFG and IVV?
BUFG and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFG or IVV?
BUFG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.