BUFM vs VOO
BUFM vs VOO
AB Moderate Buffer ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $450M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.34% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.13% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BUFM vs VOO Performance
AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUFM returned +11.13% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, BUFM is up 5.34% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 5.4% for BUFM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BUFM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFM charges 0.69% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFM currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BUFM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFM or VOO?
BUFM has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUFM or VOO?
Over the past year BUFM returned +11.13% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFM annualized +10.46% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUFM or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 5.4% for BUFM. Worst drawdown: BUFM -9.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BUFM and VOO?
BUFM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BUFM and VOO?
BUFM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFM or VOO?
BUFM yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.