CAPA vs IVV
Defiance AI Capacitors Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CAPA or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CAPA led over the full window, IVV over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CAPA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.58% | +12.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.58% | +16.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.6% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5.8 years | $24,920Best | $22,858 |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 13, 2020 to Sep 14, 2026 (5.8 years).
CAPA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.8 years both funds cover.
CAPA vs IVV Performance
Defiance AI Capacitors Leaders ETF (CAPA) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CAPA returned -0.58% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, CAPA is down 0.58% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.6% for CAPA and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CAPA charges 0.71% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $3 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAPA currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CAPA and 490 in IVV, totalling 10.9% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CAPA and 490 in IVV, against full books of 1 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CAPA and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CAPA or IVV?
CAPA has an expense ratio of 0.71% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CAPA or IVV?
Over the past year CAPA returned -0.58% vs +16.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), CAPA annualized +17.05% vs +15.32% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAPA or IVV?
CAPA yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CAPA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CAPA led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.