CARK vs FFOG

CARK vs FFOG

Which is better, CARK or FFOG?

Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.

FFOG has a lower expense ratio. CARK led over 1Y, FFOG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: FFOGHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCARKFFOG
Expense Ratio0.54%0.41%Best
AUM$306M$341M
Dividend Yield0.01%0.00%
Holdings601,667
YTD Return+1.96%Best-2.09%
1Y Return+0.40%Best-5.46%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.38%+19.90%Best
Volatility (annualized)16.8%Best21.1%
Max Drawdown-25.2%Best-25.4%
$10,000 over 2.9 years$14,764$16,484Best
Fund FamilyCastleArk Management LLCFranklin Templeton Investments (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 6, 2023Nov 6, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Nov 10, 2026 (2.9 years).

CARK vs FFOG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.

Compare CARK against instead:CARK vs SPYCARK vs QQQCARK vs VOOCARK vs VTIFFOG against:FFOG vs VXUS

CARK vs FFOG Performance

CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year CARK returned +0.40% while FFOG returned -5.46%. Year to date, CARK is up 1.96% versus a loss of 2.09% for FFOG.

Over three years, CARK compounded at +14.38% per year against +19.90% for FFOG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 16.8% for CARK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.2% for CARK and -25.4% for FFOG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CARK charges 0.54% per year while FFOG charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $41 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 0.00% for FFOG.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CARK and FFOG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CARKFFOG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CARK or FFOG?

CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while FFOG charges 0.41%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CARK or FFOG?

Over the past year CARK returned +0.40% vs -5.46% for FFOG, so CARK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CARK or FFOG?

FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 16.8% for CARK. Worst drawdown: CARK -25.2% vs FFOG -25.4%.

Should I hold both CARK and FFOG?

CARK and FFOG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or FFOG?

CARK yields 0.01% while FFOG yields 0.00%, so CARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FFOG better than CARK?

FFOG has a lower expense ratio. CARK led over 1Y, FFOG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.