CARK vs IVV
CastleArk Large Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CARK or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CARK | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $339M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 29 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.21% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.2% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $15,741 | $17,331Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.0% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | CastleArk Management LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.8 years).
CARK vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
CARK vs IVV Performance
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CARK returned +9.21% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, CARK is up 7.98% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.2% for CARK and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CARK charges 0.54% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
95.4% of CARK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 40.5% of IVV's money is in holdings CARK also owns.
Most of CARK is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
27 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 490 in IVV, against full books of 29 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 455 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CARK (58.2% of the fund), and 1 for CARK that do not appear in IVV (3.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CARK | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.97% | 8.07% | 5.90% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.60% | 7.02% | 0.42% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 9.54% | 3.00% | 6.54% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.82% | 5.69% | 0.87% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.71% | 2.65% | 2.06% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 5.43% | 1.38% | 4.05% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.70% | 3.84% | 1.14% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.76% | 0.95% | 3.81% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 4.79% | 0.57% | 4.22% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 5.02% | 0.30% | 4.72% |
95.4% of CARK is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CARK or IVV?
CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CARK or IVV?
Over the past year CARK returned +9.21% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CARK or IVV?
CARK has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CARK -25.2% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both CARK and IVV?
CARK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CARK and IVV?
95.4% of CARK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 40.5% of IVV's is in holdings CARK also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or IVV?
CARK yields 0.01% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CARK?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.