CBOA vs IVV
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CBOA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -6.34% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -6.70% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
CBOA vs IVV Performance
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CBOA returned -6.70% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, CBOA is down 6.34% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.7% for CBOA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for CBOA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CBOA charges 0.69% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CBOA currently yields 2.38% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CBOA or IVV?
CBOA has an expense ratio of 0.69% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CBOA or IVV?
Over the past year CBOA returned -6.70% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CBOA annualized -0.71% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CBOA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.7% for CBOA. Worst drawdown: CBOA -8.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CBOA and IVV?
CBOA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CBOA or IVV?
CBOA yields 2.38% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CBOA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.