CBON vs QQQ
VanEck China Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CBON or QQQ?
Short Term Low Quality against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CBON | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $26M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 37 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +6.92% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.69% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.13% | +25.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.40% | +15.24%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3%Best | 18.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,259 | $20,324Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Low Quality | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2014 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 11, 2014 to Sep 18, 2026 (11.9 years).
CBON vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CBON vs QQQ Performance
VanEck China Bond ETF (CBON) is an ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CBON returned +9.69% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, CBON is up 6.92% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, CBON compounded at +6.13% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +2.40% and +15.24% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.24% annualized vs +0.79%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 5.3% for CBON. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for CBON and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CBON charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CBON currently yields 1.48% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CBON and 102 in QQQ, totalling 3.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CBON and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 37 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CBON and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CBON or QQQ?
CBON has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CBON or QQQ?
Over the past year CBON returned +9.69% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), CBON annualized +0.79% vs +18.24% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CBON or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 5.3% for CBON. Worst drawdown: CBON -15.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both CBON and QQQ?
CBON and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CBON or QQQ?
CBON yields 1.48% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CBON currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CBON?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.