CBOY vs IVV

CBOY vs IVV

Which is better, CBOY or IVV?

IVV has been ahead.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCBOYIVV
Expense Ratio0.69%0.03%Best
AUM$5M$876.4B
Dividend Yield1.34%1.06%
Holdings7508
YTD Return+1.44%+12.27%Best
1Y Return-0.55%+17.04%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.24%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.08%
Volatility (annualized)2.9%Best12.4%
Max Drawdown-4.0%Best-8.9%
$10,000 over 1.2 years$10,129$12,454Best
Fund FamilyCalamos InvestmentsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
Style-Large Cap Blend
InceptionJul 8, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 8, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.2 years).

CBOY vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.

CBOY vs IVV Performance

Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY) is an ETF from Calamos Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CBOY returned -0.55% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, CBOY is up 1.44% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 2.9% for CBOY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.0% for CBOY and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CBOY charges 0.69% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CBOY currently yields 1.34% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in CBOY and 490 in IVV, totalling 152.3% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CBOY and 490 in IVV, against full books of 7 and 508.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CBOY and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CBOYIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CBOY or IVV?

CBOY has an expense ratio of 0.69% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CBOY or IVV?

Over the past year CBOY returned -0.55% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CBOY annualized +1.07% vs +20.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CBOY or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 2.9% for CBOY. Worst drawdown: CBOY -4.0% vs IVV -8.9%.

Should I hold both CBOY and IVV?

CBOY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CBOY or IVV?

CBOY yields 1.34% while IVV yields 1.06%, so CBOY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than CBOY?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.