CBTA vs SPY

CBTA vs SPY

Which is better, CBTA or SPY?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCBTASPY
Expense Ratio0.69%0.09%Best
AUM$6M$804.7B
Dividend Yield1.06%0.98%
Holdings7505
YTD Return-14.94%+12.09%Best
1Y Return-26.49%+16.29%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.20%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.37%
Volatility (annualized)27.1%12.2%Best
Max Drawdown-39.8%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.4 years$9,718$15,097Best
Fund FamilyCalamos InvestmentsState Street Investment Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 7, 2025Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.4 years).

CBTA vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.

CBTA vs SPY Performance

Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA) is an ETF from Calamos Investments and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year CBTA returned -26.49% while SPY returned +16.29%. Year to date, CBTA is down 14.94% versus a gain of 12.09% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CBTA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.1% compared with 12.2% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.8% for CBTA and -8.9% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CBTA charges 0.69% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $9 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CBTA currently yields 1.06% against 0.98% for SPY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CBTA and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CBTASPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CBTA or SPY?

CBTA has an expense ratio of 0.69% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CBTA or SPY?

Over the past year CBTA returned -26.49% vs +16.29% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CBTA annualized -2.02% vs +34.21% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CBTA or SPY?

CBTA has been the more volatile fund at 27.1% annualized versus 12.2% for SPY. Worst drawdown: CBTA -39.8% vs SPY -8.9%.

Should I hold both CBTA and SPY?

CBTA and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CBTA or SPY?

CBTA yields 1.06% while SPY yields 0.98%, so CBTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than CBTA?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.