CCIF vs VXUS
CCIF vs VXUS
Carlyle Credit Income Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCIF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 13.82% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $56M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 38.71% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 45 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -30.81% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -31.58% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -14.32% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.87% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Carlyle Credit Income Fund | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2011 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CCIF vs VXUS Performance
Carlyle Credit Income Fund (CCIF) is a ETF from Carlyle Credit Income Fund and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCIF returned -31.58% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CCIF is down 30.81% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, CCIF compounded at -14.32% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -8.87% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -2.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCIF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.6% for CCIF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCIF charges 13.82% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $1382 vs $5 annually, a gap of $1377 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCIF currently yields 38.71% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCIF or VXUS?
CCIF has an expense ratio of 13.82% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1377 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCIF or VXUS?
Over the past year CCIF returned -31.58% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), CCIF annualized -2.77% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCIF or VXUS?
CCIF has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CCIF -55.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CCIF and VXUS?
CCIF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCIF or VXUS?
CCIF yields 38.71% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so CCIF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.