CCRP vs QQQ
Columbia Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CCRP or QQQ?
Investment Grade Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCRP | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 340 | 208 |
| YTD Return | -1.85% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.99% | +11.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CCRP vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CCRP vs QQQ Performance
Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CCRP returned -1.99% while QQQ returned +11.59%. Year to date, CCRP is down 1.85% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCRP charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCRP currently yields 3.77% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 87 holdings in CCRP and 101 in QQQ, totalling 51.4% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in CCRP and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 340 and 208.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CCRP and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCRP or QQQ?
CCRP has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCRP or QQQ?
Over the past year CCRP returned -1.99% vs +11.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCRP or QQQ?
CCRP yields 3.77% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so CCRP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CCRP?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.