CCRP vs VTI
Columbia Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CCRP or VTI?
Investment Grade Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCRP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 340 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | -1.59% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.73% | +11.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.84% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CCRP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CCRP vs VTI Performance
Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCRP returned -1.73% while VTI returned +11.14%. Year to date, CCRP is down 1.59% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCRP charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCRP currently yields 3.77% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 87 holdings in CCRP and 3,464 in VTI, totalling 51.4% and 97.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in CCRP and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 340 and 3,542.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CCRP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCRP or VTI?
CCRP has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCRP or VTI?
Over the past year CCRP returned -1.73% vs +11.14% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCRP or VTI?
CCRP yields 3.77% while VTI yields 1.06%, so CCRP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CCRP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.