CLSZ vs IVV
Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLSZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $896,459.93 | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -79.21% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
CLSZ vs IVV Performance
Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CLSZ is down 79.21% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.1% for CLSZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLSZ charges 1.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $149 vs $3 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLSZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLSZ or IVV?
CLSZ has an expense ratio of 1.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $146 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLSZ or IVV?
CLSZ yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.