CLSZ vs QQQ
Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLSZ | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.49% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $896,459.93 | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -79.21% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CLSZ vs QQQ Performance
Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, CLSZ is down 79.21% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.1% for CLSZ and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLSZ charges 1.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $149 vs $18 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLSZ currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLSZ or QQQ?
CLSZ has an expense ratio of 1.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $131 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLSZ or QQQ?
CLSZ yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.