CMBO vs VYM
Wayfinder Dynamic US Interest Rate ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CMBO or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMBO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 6 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +0.86% | +10.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.44% | +15.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.05% |
| Fund Family | Wayfinder ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CMBO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CMBO vs VYM Performance
Wayfinder Dynamic US Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) is an ETF from Wayfinder ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CMBO returned +1.44% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, CMBO is up 0.86% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMBO charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMBO currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CMBO and 557 in VYM, totalling 3.5% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CMBO and 557 in VYM, against full books of 6 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CMBO and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMBO or VYM?
CMBO has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CMBO or VYM?
Over the past year CMBO returned +1.44% vs +15.42% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMBO or VYM?
CMBO yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CMBO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.