CNQQ vs VTI

CNQQ vs VTI

Which is better, CNQQ or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCNQQVTI
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$47M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.49%1.03%
Holdings1053,543
YTD Return-7.13%+12.57%Best
1Y Return-9.76%+17.22%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.87%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.86%
Volatility (annualized)21.0%13.0%Best
Fund FamilyRayliant Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 25, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

CNQQ vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CNQQ vs VTI Performance

Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) is an ETF from Rayliant Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNQQ returned -9.76% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, CNQQ is down 7.13% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CNQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CNQQ charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNQQ currently yields 0.49% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 100 holdings in CNQQ and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 99.5% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, CNQQ as of Aug 18, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in CNQQ and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 105 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CNQQ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CNQQVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CNQQ or VTI?

CNQQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CNQQ or VTI?

Over the past year CNQQ returned -9.76% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CNQQ or VTI?

CNQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI.

Should I hold both CNQQ and VTI?

CNQQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CNQQ or VTI?

CNQQ yields 0.49% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than CNQQ?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.