CNQQ vs VXUS
Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, CNQQ or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNQQ | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $47M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 105 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -7.73% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.35% | +22.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.82% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 14.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Rayliant Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CNQQ vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CNQQ vs VXUS Performance
Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) is an ETF from Rayliant Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNQQ returned -10.35% while VXUS returned +22.44%. Year to date, CNQQ is down 7.73% versus a gain of 13.35% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 14.2% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNQQ charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNQQ currently yields 0.49% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 69.3% of CNQQ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, CNQQ as of Aug 18, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
69 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in CNQQ and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 105 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CNQQ | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9988:HKAlibaba Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares | 9.29% | 0.49% | 8.80% |
| 300750:SHContemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. Class A | 6.37% | 0.04% | 6.33% |
| 300308:SHZhongji Innolight Co. Ltd. Class A | 6.29% | 0.03% | 6.26% |
| 3690:SHMeituan-class B | 3.06% | 0.11% | 2.95% |
| 688256:SHCambricon Technologies Corp Common Stock | 2.65% | 0.01% | 2.64% |
| 9999:KYNetease, Inc. | 2.23% | 0.10% | 2.13% |
| 300502:SHEoptolink Technology Inc. Ltd. Class A | 2.22% | 0.02% | 2.20% |
| 688012:SHAdvanced Micro Fabrication Equipment Inc. A CNY1 | 2.02% | 0.01% | 2.01% |
| 603986:SHGigadevice Semiconductor Beijing Inc. Class A | 1.96% | 0.01% | 1.95% |
| 688041:SHHygon Information Technolo-A Common Stock | 1.78% | 0.01% | 1.77% |
69.3% of CNQQ is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNQQ or VXUS?
CNQQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CNQQ or VXUS?
Over the past year CNQQ returned -10.35% vs +22.44% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CNQQ or VXUS?
CNQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VXUS.
Should I hold both CNQQ and VXUS?
CNQQ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CNQQ and VXUS?
At least 69.3% of CNQQ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in CNQQ and 8,091 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNQQ or VXUS?
CNQQ yields 0.49% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than CNQQ?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.