CNYA vs IVV
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNYA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $204M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.68% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 416 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +3.81% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.79% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.39% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.99% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
CNYA vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CNYA returned +18.79% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, CNYA is up 3.81% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, CNYA compounded at +10.39% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.99% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNYA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.5% for CNYA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNYA charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNYA currently yields 1.68% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CNYA and IVV share 1 holdings out of 910 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CNYA | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.20% | 0.15% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNYA or IVV?
CNYA has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNYA or IVV?
Over the past year CNYA returned +18.79% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CNYA annualized +5.91% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNYA or IVV?
CNYA has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CNYA -49.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CNYA and IVV?
CNYA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNYA and IVV?
CNYA and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 910 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNYA or IVV?
CNYA yields 1.68% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CNYA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.