CNYA vs VTI
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNYA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $228M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.84% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 416 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.95% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.98% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.95% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.54% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
CNYA vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNYA returned +13.98% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, CNYA is up 1.95% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, CNYA compounded at +10.95% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.54% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +5.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNYA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.5% for CNYA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNYA charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNYA currently yields 1.84% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CNYA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3193 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNYA or VTI?
CNYA has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNYA or VTI?
Over the past year CNYA returned +13.98% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CNYA annualized +5.71% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNYA or VTI?
CNYA has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CNYA -49.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CNYA and VTI?
CNYA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNYA and VTI?
CNYA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3193 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNYA or VTI?
CNYA yields 1.84% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CNYA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.