CONL vs VXUS
CONL vs VXUS
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CONL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.04% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $523M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -72.59% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -86.95% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -31.12% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 159.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -95.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CONL vs VXUS Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CONL returned -86.95% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CONL is down 72.59% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, CONL compounded at -31.12% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -32.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CONL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 159.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.4% for CONL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CONL charges 1.04% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $104 vs $5 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CONL currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CONL and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CONL or VXUS?
CONL has an expense ratio of 1.04% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CONL or VXUS?
Over the past year CONL returned -86.95% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CONL annualized -32.43% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CONL or VXUS?
CONL has been the more volatile fund at 159.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CONL -95.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CONL and VXUS?
CONL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CONL and VXUS?
CONL and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CONL or VXUS?
CONL yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.