CORN vs IVV
Teucrium Corn Fund ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $174M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 24 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.06% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.28% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -8.11% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.14% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
CORN vs IVV Performance
Teucrium Corn Fund ETF (CORN) is a ETF from Teucrium and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CORN returned +3.28% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, CORN is up 0.06% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, CORN compounded at -8.11% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -3.14% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs -2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CORN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.1% for CORN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORN charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORN currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CORN and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORN or IVV?
CORN has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CORN or IVV?
Over the past year CORN returned +3.28% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), CORN annualized -2.17% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CORN or IVV?
CORN has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CORN -78.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CORN and IVV?
CORN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CORN and IVV?
CORN and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORN or IVV?
CORN yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.