CORN vs QQQ
CORN vs QQQ
Teucrium Corn Fund ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $174M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 24 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.06% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.28% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -8.11% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.14% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2010 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CORN vs QQQ Performance
Teucrium Corn Fund ETF (CORN) is a ETF from Teucrium and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CORN returned +3.28% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, CORN is up 0.06% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, CORN compounded at -8.11% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -3.14% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs -2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.6% for CORN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.1% for CORN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORN charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORN currently yields 0.00% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CORN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORN or QQQ?
CORN has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CORN or QQQ?
Over the past year CORN returned +3.28% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), CORN annualized -2.17% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CORN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.6% for CORN. Worst drawdown: CORN -78.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CORN and QQQ?
CORN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CORN and QQQ?
CORN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORN or QQQ?
CORN yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.