CPU vs IVV
Amplify Top 10 Semiconductors ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CPU or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPU | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $974,847.08 | $879.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 11 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -34.73% | +11.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.45% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.61% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CPU vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CPU vs IVV Performance
Amplify Top 10 Semiconductors ETF (CPU) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CPU is down 34.73% versus a gain of 11.33% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPU charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPU currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.3% of IVV's money is in holdings CPU also owns.
Stated as a floor: for CPU, our book for it covers 93.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and CPU share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 11 positions we hold weights for in CPU and 490 in IVV, against full books of 11 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CPU and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPU or IVV?
CPU has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CPU and IVV?
At least 3.3% of IVV's money is in holdings CPU also owns. Our book for CPU is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 11 positions we hold weights for in CPU and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPU or IVV?
CPU yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CPU?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.