CRXP vs SCHD
Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, CRXP or SCHD?
SCHD has been ahead.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRXP | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $119.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.84% | 2.96% |
| Holdings | 381 | 204 |
| YTD Return | -1.04% | +33.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.22% | +37.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.32% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.36% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CRXP vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CRXP vs SCHD Performance
Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CRXP returned -1.22% while SCHD returned +37.17%. Year to date, CRXP is down 1.04% versus a gain of 33.09% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRXP charges 0.38% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $6 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRXP currently yields 3.84% against 2.96% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 72 holdings in CRXP and 98 in SCHD, totalling 20.8% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in CRXP and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 381 and 204.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CRXP and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRXP or SCHD?
CRXP has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CRXP or SCHD?
Over the past year CRXP returned -1.22% vs +37.17% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRXP or SCHD?
CRXP yields 3.84% while SCHD yields 2.96%, so CRXP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than CRXP?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.