CSCL vs IVV
Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CSCL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSCL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $15M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +127.09% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +152.88% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 72.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
CSCL vs IVV Performance
Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF (CSCL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CSCL returned +152.88% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, CSCL is up 127.09% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSCL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for CSCL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSCL charges 1.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSCL currently yields 1.22% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CSCL and IVV share 1 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CSCL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO | 15.20% | 0.69% | 14.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSCL or IVV?
CSCL has an expense ratio of 1.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSCL or IVV?
Over the past year CSCL returned +152.88% vs +23.01% for IVV, so CSCL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CSCL annualized +141.14% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSCL or IVV?
CSCL has been the more volatile fund at 72.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CSCL -30.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CSCL and IVV?
CSCL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSCL and IVV?
CSCL and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSCL or IVV?
CSCL yields 1.22% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CSCL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.