CSCL vs QQQ
Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CSCL delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSCL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $15M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +119.37% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +144.29% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 72.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CSCL vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X ETF (CSCL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CSCL returned +144.29% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, CSCL is up 119.37% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSCL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.2% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for CSCL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSCL charges 1.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $18 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSCL currently yields 1.22% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CSCL and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 107 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CSCL | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO | 15.20% | 2.08% | 13.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSCL or QQQ?
CSCL has an expense ratio of 1.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSCL or QQQ?
Over the past year CSCL returned +144.29% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so CSCL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CSCL annualized +133.36% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSCL or QQQ?
CSCL has been the more volatile fund at 72.2% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CSCL -30.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CSCL and QQQ?
CSCL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSCL and QQQ?
CSCL and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 107 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSCL or QQQ?
CSCL yields 1.22% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so CSCL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.