CTEC vs QQQ
Global X ClimateTech ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CTEC delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CTEC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $24M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +4.77% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.67% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.88% | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.47% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CTEC vs QQQ Performance
Global X ClimateTech ETF (CTEC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CTEC returned +43.67% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, CTEC is up 4.77% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Over three years, CTEC compounded at -2.88% per year against +25.51% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -9.47% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs -4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CTEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.6% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.6% for CTEC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CTEC charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CTEC currently yields 0.55% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CTEC and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 143 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CTEC or QQQ?
CTEC has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CTEC or QQQ?
Over the past year CTEC returned +43.67% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so CTEC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), CTEC annualized -4.03% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CTEC or QQQ?
CTEC has been the more volatile fund at 39.6% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CTEC -81.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CTEC and QQQ?
CTEC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CTEC and QQQ?
CTEC and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 143 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CTEC or QQQ?
CTEC yields 0.55% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so CTEC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.