CWEB vs VXUS
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CWEB | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.27% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $215M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.67% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -47.60% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -46.85% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -13.65% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -33.82% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 72.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -98.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CWEB vs VXUS Performance
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2X ETF (CWEB) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CWEB returned -46.85% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, CWEB is down 47.60% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, CWEB compounded at -13.65% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -33.82% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs -20.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CWEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.2% for CWEB and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CWEB charges 1.27% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $127 vs $5 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CWEB currently yields 5.67% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CWEB and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7873 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CWEB or VXUS?
CWEB has an expense ratio of 1.27% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $122 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CWEB or VXUS?
Over the past year CWEB returned -46.85% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CWEB annualized -20.91% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CWEB or VXUS?
CWEB has been the more volatile fund at 72.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CWEB -98.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CWEB and VXUS?
CWEB and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CWEB and VXUS?
CWEB and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7873 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CWEB or VXUS?
CWEB yields 5.67% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so CWEB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.