CXRN vs IVV
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CXRN or IVV?
Commodities against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CXRN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +14.23%Best | +13.32% |
| 1Y Return | +12.87% | +17.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.20% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.8% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.2% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $8,953 | $13,060Best |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Commodities | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2024 to Sep 23, 2026 (1.8 years).
CXRN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
CXRN vs IVV Performance
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) is an ETF from Teucrium and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CXRN returned +12.87% while IVV returned +17.08%. Year to date, CXRN is up 14.23% versus a gain of 13.32% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CXRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.8% compared with 12.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.2% for CXRN and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CXRN charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CXRN currently yields 1.74% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CXRN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CXRN or IVV?
CXRN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CXRN or IVV?
Over the past year CXRN returned +12.87% vs +17.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CXRN annualized -5.96% vs +15.99% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CXRN or IVV?
CXRN has been the more volatile fund at 37.8% annualized versus 12.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CXRN -53.2% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both CXRN and IVV?
CXRN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CXRN or IVV?
CXRN yields 1.74% while IVV yields 1.06%, so CXRN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CXRN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.