CXRN vs IVV
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CXRN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +3.18% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.03% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
CXRN vs IVV Performance
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) is a ETF from Teucrium and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CXRN returned +13.03% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, CXRN is up 3.18% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CXRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.2% for CXRN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CXRN charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CXRN currently yields 2.38% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CXRN or IVV?
CXRN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CXRN or IVV?
Over the past year CXRN returned +13.03% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CXRN annualized -11.77% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CXRN or IVV?
CXRN has been the more volatile fund at 31.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CXRN -53.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CXRN and IVV?
CXRN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CXRN or IVV?
CXRN yields 2.38% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CXRN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.