CXRN vs VTI
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CXRN or VTI?
Commodities against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CXRN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 3 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.56%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +12.89% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.9% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $8,893 | $12,852Best |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Commodities | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.8 years).
CXRN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
CXRN vs VTI Performance
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) is an ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CXRN returned +12.89% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, CXRN is up 13.56% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CXRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.9% compared with 12.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.2% for CXRN and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CXRN charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CXRN currently yields 1.74% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CXRN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CXRN or VTI?
CXRN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CXRN or VTI?
Over the past year CXRN returned +12.89% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CXRN annualized -6.31% vs +14.96% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CXRN or VTI?
CXRN has been the more volatile fund at 37.9% annualized versus 12.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CXRN -53.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both CXRN and VTI?
CXRN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CXRN or VTI?
CXRN yields 1.74% while VTI yields 1.03%, so CXRN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CXRN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.