DBMF vs SCHD
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBMF | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $2.1B | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.12% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +12.59% | +27.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.18% | +30.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.83% | +16.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.07% | +10.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2019 | Oct 20, 2011 |
DBMF vs SCHD Performance
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year DBMF returned +27.18% while SCHD returned +30.06%. Year to date, DBMF is up 12.59% versus a gain of 27.93% for SCHD.
Over three years, DBMF compounded at +9.83% per year against +16.25% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.07% and +10.03% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.56% annualized vs +7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 11.6% for DBMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for DBMF and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBMF charges 0.85% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $6 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBMF currently yields 5.12% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
DBMF and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBMF or SCHD?
DBMF has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $79 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DBMF or SCHD?
Over the past year DBMF returned +27.18% vs +30.06% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), DBMF annualized +7.88% vs +11.56% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DBMF or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 11.6% for DBMF. Worst drawdown: DBMF -20.4% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both DBMF and SCHD?
DBMF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DBMF and SCHD?
DBMF and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBMF or SCHD?
DBMF yields 5.12% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so DBMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.