DBMF vs VXUS
DBMF vs VXUS
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBMF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.1B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.16% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.87% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.89% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.16% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.08% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
DBMF vs VXUS Performance
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DBMF returned +26.89% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, DBMF is up 10.87% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, DBMF compounded at +9.16% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.08% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, DBMF has the edge at +7.71% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.6% for DBMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for DBMF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBMF charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBMF currently yields 5.16% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
DBMF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBMF or VXUS?
DBMF has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DBMF or VXUS?
Over the past year DBMF returned +26.89% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), DBMF annualized +7.71% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DBMF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.6% for DBMF. Worst drawdown: DBMF -20.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both DBMF and VXUS?
DBMF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DBMF and VXUS?
DBMF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBMF or VXUS?
DBMF yields 5.16% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so DBMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.