DEM vs IVV
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. DEM offers more diversification with 518 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DEM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.1B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.19% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 518 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +17.52% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.92% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.92% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.46% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
DEM vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (DEM) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DEM returned +23.92% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, DEM is up 17.52% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, DEM compounded at +17.92% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.46% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.0% for DEM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DEM charges 0.63% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $3 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DEM currently yields 4.19% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DEM and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1006 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DEM or IVV?
DEM has an expense ratio of 0.63% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DEM or IVV?
Over the past year DEM returned +23.92% vs +20.94% for IVV, so DEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), DEM annualized +1.78% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DEM or IVV?
DEM has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DEM -57.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DEM and IVV?
DEM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DEM and IVV?
DEM and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1006 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DEM or IVV?
DEM yields 4.19% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.