DEM vs IVV
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DEM or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DEM led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DEM is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DEM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.2B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.03% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 518 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +22.23%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +25.62%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.13% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.17% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.0% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,230 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.4%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 13, 2007 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.2 years).
DEM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.2 years both funds cover.
DEM vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (DEM) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DEM returned +25.62% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, DEM is up 22.23% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, DEM compounded at +18.13% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.17% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.14% annualized vs +1.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.0% for DEM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DEM charges 0.63% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $3 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DEM currently yields 4.03% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 508 holdings in DEM and 505 in IVV, totalling 98.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 508 positions we hold weights for in DEM and 505 in IVV, against full books of 518 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DEM (99.3% of the fund), and 8 for DEM that do not appear in IVV (1.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DEM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DEM or IVV?
DEM has an expense ratio of 0.63% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DEM or IVV?
Over the past year DEM returned +25.62% vs +17.57% for IVV, so DEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), DEM annualized +1.99% vs +9.14% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DEM or IVV?
DEM has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DEM -57.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DEM and IVV?
DEM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DEM or IVV?
DEM yields 4.03% while IVV yields 1.06%, so DEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DEM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DEM led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DEM is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.